About Me

Name:Richard
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The DNC; Looking Out For Number One

I had hear about this yesterday, but didn't have an opportunity to read the article, however Glenn Beck has the story. This is so typical of the Socialocrat Party's mindset of; "what is good for me is not for your use at all because I'm important and you're not"

The thing tha bothers me the most and Glenn Beck  said the same thing is that the MSM isn't even reporting this story.  It doesn't surprise that they're not, it just ticks me off that they're not saying or printing a word about it.

It would not surprise me in the least to find out that the MSN stoogies have somehow gotten in on this sweet little deal.
 
Well so much for being for the little guy.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When More is Less

I was at Laura Ingram's website just a few minutes ago when I came upon this article from the LA Times stating that Americans want MORE government intrusion into the economy and markets.  As I scrolled down I came to read this little paragraph.
 
 "Washington had to ride to the rescue of two government-chartered mortgage giants -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which hold or guarantee nearly half of the nation's $12 trillion in mortgage debt -- after investors all but extinguished the pair's market value amid fears that falling home prices would push them into insolvency."
 
The reader should first note the words "Government-Charted".  Now is it just me or is the LA Times suggesting that the government should intrude more into the economy (ala Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) when they cannot even run their own federally backed mortgage company/program?
 
I would also put forth here that when one clicks on the above links provided to both Fannie and Freddie the words "government sponsored enterprise" are highlighted. Uh huh just bring on the feds they can solve ALL our woes!
 
Secondly one will note in the above quote that both of those programs back nearly "HALF" of the nations mortgage debts.  However the Times seems to infer that it is the investors who are the problem. 
 
To be sure many investors were folks that speculated that the housing market would continue to go on and never take a down turn; hence the term investors. Additionally a good deal of those that took out mortgages via Fannie and Freddie were real estate investors in so far as trying to turn a quick profit by "flipping" homes.  I would think that it would certainly be a lot more difficult when the market for homes is in a down cycle.
 
It seems to me that not one person at the LA Times took the trouble to proof-read this article.
 
What's next nationalizing the oil companies? (Somehow in my mind's eye I can see the Sociolibrocrat party salivating at the revenues).  I am certain that they'd do a bang up job.  I would be willing to wager were that to happen there'd be NO congressional hearings on windfall profits.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More News You Can Use

Where Are The Headlines?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

News That You Can Use

So Why Isn't This Story Headline News?
 
So  I guess all the news that is print to fit by such outlets as the NY Times and other seemingly have ignored or just missed THIS story.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Coming to Your City

ATTENTION ATTENTION COMING TO YOUR TOWN FROM A CITY NEAR YOU!
 
It seems that are residents in California (aka the third world republic of Kalifornian) who are not exactly thrilled with the recent handling of illegal alien ( I now refuse to use the word immigrant as it implies that these folks have some sort of status) drug runners from the Sanctuary City of San Fancisco. At least somebody has awakened and smelled the coffee!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Keep Him!

Well now, I guess the US Military didn't really miss him after all! Let the Canadians keep him and put him on their cradle to grave system. At least he won't be a drain on the US taxpayers.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why They Serve

AThis is the reason WHY we are in Iraq. Thanks to Michelle Malkin Blogsite
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Am Shocked, Shocked, Shocked!

I can hardly believe my eyes while reading this report.  All I can say is;  Well Duh!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who Cares What You Want

Reported today at MSNBC the Supreme Court of California struck down a voter approved ban on gay marriage.

As per usual those on the left, who simply cannot condone the views of the majority of people in the State of California found a court and have had the voters views on marraige declared unconstitutional. As quoted in an article at Yahoo News:
 
   "The last time the state's voters were asked to express their views on same-sex marriage at the ballot box was in 2000, the year after the Legislature enacted the first of a series of laws awarding spousal rights to domestic partners.
Proposition 22, which strengthened the state's 1978 one-man, one-woman marriage law with the words "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California," passed with 61 percent  (italics mine) of the vote."
 
Did you read that? Sixtyone percent voted to approve Proposition 22 and yet these folks cannot abide by the decision of the voters.
 
In a related article former Governor of NJ, James McGreevey has stated that he cannot afford to pay alimony. Somewhere I can hear the worlds smallest violin playing.  Personally I would suggest to the former Mrs.  McGreevey to just let him wallow in his own self pity and watch him slowly decline into oblivion, but that is just me. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Put up or Shut Up

In a wonderful piece at American thinker Bob Weir puts Kieth Olberman in the spotlight and on the spot.
 
I wish somebody would interview this wretch, and ask him about his employer, pointing out all of the above mentioned facts. Then force this dirtbag into a corner by suggesting that he is taking blood money as the author has stated and then asking him to resign his position there and then on national tv. I would wager that the rule of survival of never biting the hand that feeds you would prevail.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Those Who Truly Deserve

Who Should Really Be Entitled

By R.P. Woitowitz Sr.

Editor Bluecollar Conservative 

I just happened to be reading a piece at The Patriot Post  about the current stimulus bill that is now in the Senate for approval. As usual the left is tacking on huge entitlement programs that will bloat the bill, and probably negate the actual stimulus package itself. 

 
That started me thinking, that there is really only ONE group of Americans that should be entitled to any government give a ways, (although you’d never hear them demand it), that transcends all races, genders, even sexuality. This group is the American servicemen and women and veterans, in particular the disabled amongst our finest. 

 
Who more than anyone is more deserving of any assistance that can be given to them?  Yet I hear, and I am certain that not all of these are true, but enough have to be, stories of vets that get neglected, or are in need of help in one way or another, and there are few volunteer groups available to help them in their times of need. 

 
And for those whose life was cut short, their families seem to be left out in the cold. Why not give preferential treatment for this minority? We talk endlessly about caring for the needy are they not even more in need? They have given their best, and some have given their lives, shouldn't’t they or those that they left behind be at the top of the list?

Am I calling for yet another entitlement program, certainly not, but I am suggesting increasing spending to veterans orginizations. Pushing vets and their families to the top of the list when it comes to education opportunities, grants and other goods and services that should be made available to them with no strings attatched.

 
It amazes me, that there exists groups in this country that would put the needs of ILLEGAL ALIENS, above our own warriors and count them as more deserving than those who have answered the call to our country during both war and peace.  In fact those very same people show a constant disdain for our military, and what is even worse a display a condescending, fake and phony compassion and yet all the while has called them “murderers”, “thugs” “Nazis”. 


 
I say it’s time to put them at the top of the list.  IF ANYONE is entitled to a helping hand by the American people and their government, it is they that have served to protect them and their liberties from all forces of evil. 

 
God Bless you all, those that serve or have served.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Does She Really Think This?

 

             

This is the leadership of Congress?

By Richard Woitowitz

Editor Bluecollar Conservative

Global warming is the issue upon which this generation of leaders will be judged by posterity.  Only this generation can make the changes needed in time to avert a crisis that our children and grandchildren will otherwise have to face.


 
Ms. Speaker, you simply cannot be serious?  Global warming is THE issue that our children will judge us on?  I was thinking more in terms of the Jihad that has been declared upon us by the Islamo-facists.

Somehow I get the feeling, Ms Speaker that Global warming would be the least of our worries should they ever succeed.

If THIS doesn’t prove that the left isn’t serious on National Defense, secure borders, and terrorism, I don’t know what it will take short of a plane crashing into somewhere on the left coast.  I guess they really ARE clueless.

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Define Justice

 

 

Does Justice mean “Just us?”

By Richard Woitowitz

Editor Bluecollar Conservative

 

Recently there has been a rather explosive goings on in a town called Jena (pronounced Jeena), LA.  It all started when some white high school students hung nooses from trees on the school property to intimidate black students.   The punishment for that was suspension, and though it should have been expulsion that does not give license to what happen next.

 

Apparently a white student was sitting under a tree when he was set upon by several black students.  The students beat him severely and in due course were arrested and charged with attempted murder. 

 

Well that doesn’t seem to sit well with the black community who see this as a case of injustice.  As usual the perpetrators have become the victims and the usual race baiters of such as Sharpton and Jackson have come to stir up racial tensions. 

 

My question here is simply why weren’t those students charged with a hate crime? Would it be that the shoe was on the other foot that you could bet your bottom dollar that the same race baiters would be calling for such action?

 

I remember how the MSM tried those while lacrosse students from Duke University.  Yet none of this current event even made the news until someone felt that they got a raw deal and it was then pushed by the aforementioned sharks that it took a life of its own. 

 

For additional reading please click here and here

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Bill of Note

 

The Political Red Hens
By Richard Woitowitz
Editor Bluecollar Conservative

Remember the story of the Little Red hen? The one about a chicken that did all the work, in which not one of her barnyard associates wished to help her out until it came time to eat the pie?

Well here we see a similar situation wherein our Federal representatives are basically incapable of creating a bill that justly deals with the immigration problem in this country. However Oklahoma has dealt with the problem on and by its own and has come up with a basic simple formula that would serve well as a model for our National Legislators

There will be the usual cries of bigotry and racism. And there will no doubt a challenge in the courts by the ACLU to have this law, a law by the way which is the WILL of those governed, struck down, thereby using the usual attack of legislation via the judiciary .

It is my hope that this bill will inspire other states to pass similar ones and thereby send a message to congress.

To paraphrase the Little Red Hen story;

Who will help me secure the borders and serve the American people?

"Not I", said the United States Congressman.
"Not I", said the United StatesSenator.
"Not I ",said the President of the United States

"Then I’ll just do it myself", said the State of Oklahoma.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Now Let Us Get Down To Business

 

Killed Bill
By Richard Woitowitz
Editor Bluecollar Conservative

The Bible reminds us that it is a “fearful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God”. This is of course a truism for all the people of this earth.

Probably the most second most fearful thing is for a politician to “fall into the hands” of an aroused and well informed voter. Such must have been the case for the failure of the Kennedy/Bush Immigration Bill, aka the “Amnesty Bill”.

A number of years ago I had written an essay about immigration. At that time I had been calling for a moratorium on immigration and the securing of the borders. Apparently I have been pretty much been instep with the rest of the American citizenry. This kinship was demonstrated by the abovementioned, whose voices by the way, I believe were heard from both sides of the political isle.

Many concerns were raised by these voices. And it is the opinion of this writer that the two biggest concerns by-far were;

1) The securing of the border

2) The enforcement of this bill

It was and still hard for me to imagine that ANY bill that did not consider and address either of these two concerns would work.

The securing of the border is still of the utmost importance. I have heard it said that it would be two costly to build the fence, but I cannot accept that argument.

Firstly the US Government has spent trillions of dollars over several decades on education with far less successful results. They have raised over 250 billion after Hurricane Katrina, and yet we continually hear how cost prohibited it would be to build a fence. I have also seen how our “friends” The Saudi’s are building a high tech fence across their own borders sparing no expense. The Israeli’s built a fence as well, and although criticized for it, it served its purpose.

Secondly if one remembers correctly the funds to build a fence over a 700 mile stretch were allocated last October, but the fence has yet to be built. What is the hold-up?

This leads to the second concern which simply put is that if we do not have the will to build the fence then where is the will to enforce this new law that would “solve” the problem. The INS, and other government agencies already have problems enforcing the current laws on the book (unless of course you’re Elian Gonzalez), so what makes people believe that a newer version would be anymore successful?

Unless those in the halls of power show a willingness to make these tough choices any bill that comes before them will nothing more than political sleight of hand, and sophistry.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »